in_nomine-digest Thursday, April 25 2002 Volume 01 : Number 2613 In this digest: Re: IN> Seneschal Question Re: IN> Seneschal Question Re: IN> Picking up trouble Re: IN> Seneschal Question Re: IN> Seneschal Question IN> [Admin] Fw: Worm Klez.E immunity IN> Very Djinny IN> Very Djinny IN> Zapan, Demon Prince of Ice IN> Seneschal Question Re: IN> Zapan, Demon Prince of Ice Re: IN> Seneschal Question Re: IN> Seneschal Question IN> Nothing Like The Sun Re: IN> Seneschal Question IN> I must ask... Re: IN> I must ask... Re: IN> I must ask... Re: IN> Very Djinny Re: IN> I must ask... Re: IN> I must ask... RE: IN> Seneschal Question Re: IN> I must ask... RE: IN> Seneschal Question IN> Okay, a PERTINENT question now...Cherubim! Re: IN> I must ask... Re: IN> Nothing Like The Sun Re: IN> Okay, a PERTINENT question now...Cherubim! Re: IN> Okay, a PERTINENT question now...Cherubim! Re: IN> I must ask... IN> Lilim's Trading Cards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:53:54 -0500 From: "Cthulhu" Subject: Re: IN> Seneschal Question Michael Walton wrote: > Todd McFarlane -- and Spawn is an interesting take on Undead. I always regarded Spawn as being a more apt infernal analogue to Saints than the Undead ever were - after all, he was in Hell, and will return there someday, rather than being locked into the Corporeal Plane for all eternity. To be honest, I never saw a good reason in IN why Hell _couldn't_ grant Vessels to damned souls, other than the whole trust issue. I was working on an Infernal variant of Saints a while ago, whom I dubbed "Sinners", because I was in a silly mood that day. They were more inspired by the escaped souls from Brimstone than by Spawn, but I could always dig them up (heheh) and post them if anyone's interested. Cthulhu _____________________________________________ Free email with personality! Over 200 domains! http://www.MyOwnEmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:00:54 -0400 From: "Ruth Evers" Subject: Re: IN> Seneschal Question Holy parallel development, Batman! In Casca's campaign, there's a Sinner (he's the evil opposite of our Saint, Meredith the Codex), maybe he'll post some info w/a VO4 warning, if he doesn't want his players reading it. But, it would be cool to see yours, too! Kariel, Mercurian of TROUBLE _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:20:32 -0400 From: Whistling in the Dark Subject: Re: IN> Picking up trouble At 10:19 PM -0400 4/22/02, Eric Bertish wrote: > > Hey, Dave! I think I've found out where the bloody >> hammer is: Casca hid it in another campaign! > >*speechless* > >The thing is, I'd do it if I could figure out *how*. That'd be one hell of >a game session. > >Me: "Okay, you've managed to find Meginjord in the VO4 continuum, but to >find Jarngreipr you have to travel to Eric Burns' game and get it there. Jarngreipr? Oh, just one of many secrets. Many many many secrets. Where is it? Well, before you'll find that out, you'll have to find a secret of equal worth... what secret, you ask? Why, the shipping date of the EPG of course.... (No, I'm not dead. Though it's been close a time or three.) - -- Eric Alfred Burns - Impudite of Secrets (candidate for the Word of Obscurity) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:48:29 -0400 From: Elizabeth McCoy Subject: Re: IN> Seneschal Question At 5:55 AM -0700 4/24/02, Michael Walton wrote: >--- "William J. Keith" wrote: >> Shenir, a Malakite of Light > > There were no Malakim before the Fall, so there were no >Malakim of Light. Shenir used to be a Seraph, I believe. If I recall the name correctly from the Liber Castellorum... O:> He's a bit angsty, he is. Got a good Tether from a lifespan POV, though! - --emccoy@nh.ultranet.com // arcangel@io.com In Nomine Line Editor RPG links; Random name list, Art: http://www.io.com/~arcangel/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:56:20 -0400 From: Elizabeth McCoy Subject: Re: IN> Seneschal Question At 12:21 AM -0400 4/24/02, William J. Keith wrote: >Something to put into the next printing of the Liber Castellorum, maybe. *beth squints at this* *beth squints at the material below* And, er, what are you suggesting be _cut_ from the Liber Castellorum's hypothetical second edition, to make room? >Or we could whip up a quick set of house rules and INC it. The INC doesn't have a wordcount. Sounds good to me. O:> Besides, then I don't have to actually worry about canonizing it. O;D [...] >the War. Advancement by Word-expansion is still possible -- the current >Angel of Hurricanes was once the Word-bound Seneschal of that intermittent >Tether of Janus', and the current Seneschal of Hurricanes is widely Truth be told, I strongly suspect that in that case, the Seneschal of Hurricanes and the Angel of Hurricanes -- would be the same entity. The phenomonon doesn't have _that_ much symbolic change in human minds (save perhaps with Mungojerrie and Rumpleteaser, who can be said to be spreading Windy chaos anyway), and there's really no reason to have a Seneschal who isn't also the Angel of... Indeed, seeing as how the concept is "Word-bound to your Tether," and Hurricanes is a transient Tether anyawy, I really can't see how one would have a "Seneschal of/Angel of" split anyway! You'd get them sharing the Word. Ditto Tornados. Ditto, if there is one, Earthquakes, Volcanos, etc. - --emccoy@nh.ultranet.com // arcangel@io.com In Nomine Line Editor RPG links; Random name list, Art: http://www.io.com/~arcangel/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:23:24 -0400 From: Elizabeth McCoy Subject: IN> [Admin] Fw: Worm Klez.E immunity I've been seeing some stuff bouncing from the list that looks like it might be a virus. (It sends huge files, plus something from... email? Anyone with a Sherizo_in_Hell email address needs to get rid of the spamming virus!) I don't know if this is related, but it's something to watch out for. >From: "Sage" >Subject: Fw: Worm Klez.E immunity >Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:41:47 -0500 > >This is the cutest thing ever. A virus that is attached to a message >claiming it's an anti-virus tool specifically made to combat THAT VIRUS. > >I'm sure most of you will ignore it, but just in case, if you get this, >don't open the attachment. It is, in fact, a virus, and not an "anti-virus >tool." > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "samara" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 4:31 AM >Subject: Worm Klez.E immunity > > >Klez.E is the most common world-wide spreading worm.It's very dangerous by >corrupting your files. >Because of its very smart stealth and anti-anti-virus technic,most common AV >software can't detect or clean it. >We developed this free immunity tool to defeat the malicious virus. >You only need to run this tool once,and then Klez will never come into your >PC. >NOTE: Because this tool acts as a fake Klez to fool the real worm,some AV >monitor maybe cry when you run it. >If so,Ignore the warning,and select 'continue'. >If you have any question,please mail to me. > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:24:12 +0000 From: "Perry Lloyd" Subject: IN> Very Djinny http://www.mycfnow.com/sh/news/stories/nat-news-141467020020423-160421.html from real life, disturbing but, for advice on portraying a djinn (villian NPC, likely) djinn djinn djinn ... - -Perry perrylloyd@hotmail.com pl312993@oak.cats.ohiou.edu http://www.geocities.com/perrylloyd/ "And that's the hardest thing for a human being to do - be wrong. Do you know that people would rather die than be wrong?" - --from A Matter For Men by David Gerrold _________________________________________________________________ T鬩chargez MSN Explorer gratuitement ࠬ'adresse http://explorer.msn.fr/intl.asp. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:24:44 +0000 From: "Perry Lloyd" Subject: IN> Very Djinny http://www.mycfnow.com/sh/news/stories/nat-news-141467020020423-160421.html from real life, disturbing but, for advice on portraying a djinn (villian NPC, likely) djinn djinn djinn ... - -Perry perrylloyd@hotmail.com pl312993@oak.cats.ohiou.edu http://www.geocities.com/perrylloyd/ "And that's the hardest thing for a human being to do - be wrong. Do you know that people would rather die than be wrong?" - --from A Matter For Men by David Gerrold _________________________________________________________________ Discutez en ligne avec vos amis, essayez MSN Messenger : http://messenger.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:25:27 -0400 From: "Brian C. Petery" Subject: IN> Zapan, Demon Prince of Ice >+6: the iceberg that sank the Titanic The iceberg that sank the Titanic?!?! It melted last millenium! Unless you mean the dream-etherial version... A piece of the Titanic might be a little more realistic. Or maybe the place where Shackleton's ship sank. How about Scott's grave? "I still don't like this ship. I have a queer feeling about it." Chief Officer (of the Titanic) Henry Wilde, in a letter to his sister. BC Petery http://www15.brinkster.com/ugwump/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:25:23 -0400 From: "Brian C. Petery" Subject: IN> Seneschal Question >>A sort of Celestial golden parachute? Like the Seneschal of the Circus >>Maximus (Roman arena predating the Coliseum. Tether to Baal?) becomes the >>Word of Circuses? I can't believe I'm the only one who noticed the transfer from Baal to Kobal. Or maybe it is still Baal's - that's why so many little kids find clowns scary. There's probably a better example, but I can't think of one. I'll Shut Up Now, BC Petery http://www15.brinkster.com/ugwump/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:33:17 -0400 From: EDG Subject: Re: IN> Zapan, Demon Prince of Ice At 06:25 PM 4/24/02 -0400, you wrote: > >+6: the iceberg that sank the Titanic > >The iceberg that sank the Titanic?!?! It melted last millenium! Unless you >mean the dream-etherial version... An invocation modifier doesn't necessarily have to be easy to find. - -EDG ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:51:20 -0400 From: "William J. Keith" Subject: Re: IN> Seneschal Question >> Shenir, a Malakite of Light > > There were no Malakim before the Fall, so there were no >Malakim of Light. Shenir turned Malakite during the Fall -- otherwise, I'd bet David (who knows he's there) probably would have had him, at the very least, removed, and possibly destroyed. At any rate, he's canon, from the Liber Castellorum. I find it a pity that he's not written up, since a glimpse at a Malakite of Light Attunement would be keen. >===== >Michael Walton, #US2002023848 William ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:54:13 -0400 From: "William J. Keith" Subject: Re: IN> Seneschal Question >>Something to put into the next printing of the Liber Castellorum, maybe. > >*beth squints at this* *beth squints at the material below* > >And, er, what are you suggesting be _cut_ from the Liber Castellorum's >hypothetical second edition, to make room? > >>Or we could whip up a quick set of house rules and INC it. > >The INC doesn't have a wordcount. Sounds good to me. O:> Besides, then I >don't have to actually worry about canonizing it. O;D Fair enough. As you like, it's all yours once I send it here. >Truth be told, I strongly suspect that in that case, the Seneschal of >Hurricanes and the Angel of Hurricanes -- would be the same entity. The >phenomonon doesn't have _that_ much symbolic change in human minds (save >perhaps with Mungojerrie and Rumpleteaser, who can be said to be spreading >Windy chaos anyway), and there's really no reason to have a Seneschal who >isn't also the Angel of... > >Indeed, seeing as how the concept is "Word-bound to your Tether," and >Hurricanes is a transient Tether anyawy, I really can't see how one would >have a "Seneschal of/Angel of" split anyway! You'd get them sharing the >Word. > >Ditto Tornados. > >Ditto, if there is one, Earthquakes, Volcanos, etc. *nod* Makes sense. Cut that sentence, then. If this does go up somewhere, and somebody wants a separate draft, just give me a whistle. >--emccoy@nh.ultranet.com // arcangel@io.com In Nomine Line Editor >RPG links; Random name list, Art: http://www.io.com/~arcangel/ William ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:18:43 -0400 From: EDG Subject: IN> Nothing Like The Sun Surprise! ;) - -EDG - -- The air in the clearing was cool and still as Haagenti stumbled into it. His arm was now stiffening; the veins through which his ichor flowed were turning dark as the manufactured disease crawled into his system. He felt hot, even as the air chilled more, and he was finding it harder to concentrate. "Psychosomatic," he muttered to himself. "Not actually happening yet..." Alaemon's temple lay in the center of the clearing, long and low, surrounded by a moat and the mist that rose from it. Instead of a drawbridge there was an arched stone bridge across the twenty-foot moat, and over this a constant stream of human souls walked, proceeding into Alaemon's chambers to be inducted into the rites and rituals of Secrets. It was to this building that Haagenti stole, as quickly as he could, brushing past the line of souls and bursting into the chamber beyond. "I must see Alaemon!" he cried, but none looked up. The souls continued to march, one foot at a time; the only demon in the hall continued to transcribe the names of those who passed him. Above - for the temple had only the rim of a roof, supported by columns and walls on every side - the moon shone brightly down upon Haagenti, as it always did here in the realm of Secrets. From the shadow of a column stepped a figure in black robes inlaid with scarlet letters in a tongue none had read or spoken for millennia. "You have my knife?" whispered the figure, extending its hand. "I do," replied Haagenti, holding the knife by its crosspiece, disallowing it to touch him as he lay the hilt in the outstretched hand. "But - I must beg another favor. I have been poisoned by a relic of the ancient Prince of Disease... can you solve this?" Alaemon laughed sibilantly, his teeth gleaming beneath his cowl. "I know a way... but I think you'd have rather a distaste for my solution. On the other hand, your friend Asmodeus would probably love it..." Haagenti spat. "Thanks for nothing, then," he said, heading for the back. He heard Alaemon begin to laugh again as he passed between the columns and again into the stark moonlight, almost running for the way out. It wasn't there. "You!" shouted Haagenti at the top of his voice. "You have tricked me!" His arm hung at his side now, the very skin beginning to blacken. "The only way out," said Alaemon, beside him, "is the permanent way out." The knife still gleamed in his hand. "No," growled Haagenti, "there is another. You have driven me to this, and know that I hate you for it. You were the only one who could, in the end." He grinned suddenly. "Tell Asmodeus that the cycle is complete. But try to stay out of his way - he'll try to kill you for it." "I know," said Asmodeus simply, and stepped back as Haagenti relaxed his Superior-icon and unleashed his true form. Where once had stood a tall dark man in a somewhat badly-tailored business suit now spun countless rings of fire, one black, its flames oozing with disease instead of burning with passion. Many eyes rose to the Hellish sky that night as those rings of fire screamed upward, clawing their way toward Heaven. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:21:59 +1000 From: "Shane" Subject: Re: IN> Seneschal Question On 24 Apr 2002, 19:51, William J. Keith wrote: > Shenir turned Malakite during the Fall -- otherwise, I'd bet David (who > knows he's there) probably would have had him, at the very least, removed, > and possibly destroyed. At any rate, he's canon, from the Liber Removed sure, but I don't think the AA of Stone would destroy someone simply for being a non-Malakite Angel of Light. Besides breaking his own dissonance conditions (never start a fight, and pre-emptive soul-killing is one Hell of a way to start a fight) it seems to me it goes against the core book writeup: David encourages strength, perseverance, community - to me killing an angel who's already been betrayed by their own superior doesn't fit this. Or is this some other David? > Castellorum. I find it a pity that he's not written up, since a glimpse > at a Malakite of Light Attunement would be keen. Wouldn't that require an available Archangel of Light to give out the Attunement? :) (hrm, can AAs create Choir Attunements for other than their own Word?) Shane. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:12:59 -0700 From: WonderGecko Subject: IN> I must ask... ...if I hear a song on the radio--a certain Unwritten Law's Seein' Red--and decide it must the quintessential song for a Malakite somewhere, and then spin off an angel with the Word of Pop Music and a bizarre attunement that involves defining someone by a Top 40 song (I haven't worked out all the kinks, only that a Top 40 song is somehow involved), am I addicted to IN? Eee. Hello, by the way. I'm new here, and would like to think I reek of capricious energy, or something to that effect. - --Kim, Angel of Random Enthusiasm PS: Tool's "Spiral" invokes images of Habbalah, probably for completely logical reasons. The chorus DOES have 'as above, so below' in it somewhere. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:27:56 -0400 From: EDG Subject: Re: IN> I must ask... At 06:12 PM 4/24/02 -0700, you wrote: >kinks, only that a Top 40 song is somehow involved), am I addicted to IN? Not any more than the rest of us. Hell, last year Moe spent five months basing IN elements on bits from the 2001 calendar... >Eee. Hello, by the way. I'm new here, and would like to think I reek of >capricious energy, or something to that effect. Welcome. :) But.... >PS: Tool's "Spiral" invokes images of Habbalah, probably for completely >logical reasons. The chorus DOES have 'as above, so below' in it somewhere. ...don't forget that IN Music is a Forbidden Thread. ;) - -EDG ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:53:46 -0400 From: "Eric Bertish" Subject: Re: IN> I must ask... > Not any more than the rest of us. Hell, last year Moe spent five months > basing IN elements on bits from the 2001 calendar... And I must apologize for the missing seven months, because he moved to my area and joined my game and thus had another outlet for IN urges. Sometimes I feel I did the list a disservice. - -- Casca "Many people hear voices when no-one is there. Some of them are called mad and are shut up in rooms where they stare at the walls all day. Others are called writers and they do pretty much the same thing." --Margaret Chittenden, writer (PS: Neener.) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:00:14 -0400 From: "Patrick None" Subject: Re: IN> Very Djinny I don't know if this says good or bad things about my game, but it seems pretty Malakitie, too. Particularly a Malakite of Janus. Patrick > > http://www.mycfnow.com/sh/news/stories/nat-news-141467020020423-160421.html > > from real life, disturbing > > but, for advice on portraying a djinn (villian NPC, likely) > > djinn djinn djinn ... > > -Perry > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:57:09 -0700 From: WonderGecko Subject: Re: IN> I must ask... On 24.04.2002 6:27 PM, "EDG" wrote: > At 06:12 PM 4/24/02 -0700, you wrote: > > >> kinks, only that a Top 40 song is somehow involved), am I addicted to IN? > > Not any more than the rest of us. Hell, last year Moe spent five months > basing IN elements on bits from the 2001 calendar... Mmmn, yesss. I am reading through this as we speak. Type. Whatever. > >> Eee. Hello, by the way. I'm new here, and would like to think I reek of >> capricious energy, or something to that effect. > > Welcome. :) But.... > >> PS: Tool's "Spiral" invokes images of Habbalah, probably for completely >> logical reasons. The chorus DOES have 'as above, so below' in it somewhere. > > ...don't forget that IN Music is a Forbidden Thread. ;) *headtilt* *headtilts the other way* I knew I'd misstep somewhere. Oops. 9.9 Well. Say no more of it. - --Kim ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:04:01 -0400 From: "William J. Keith" Subject: Re: IN> I must ask... >Eee. Hello, by the way. I'm new here, and would like to think I reek of >capricious energy, or something to that effect. Welcome. Ofanite, I see. :^) >--Kim, Angel of Random Enthusiasm William ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:51:25 -0500 From: "Bergeron, Robert F., DS1(SW)" Subject: RE: IN> Seneschal Question - -----Original Message----- From: Elizabeth McCoy [mailto:emccoy@nh.ultranet.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:56 PM To: in_nomine-l@lists.io.com Subject: Re: IN> Seneschal Question At 12:21 AM -0400 4/24/02, William J. Keith wrote: >Something to put into the next printing of the Liber Castellorum, maybe. *beth squints at this* *beth squints at the material below* And, er, what are you suggesting be _cut_ from the Liber Castellorum's hypothetical second edition, to make room? >Or we could whip up a quick set of house rules and INC it. The INC doesn't have a wordcount. Sounds good to me. O:> Besides, then I don't have to actually worry about canonizing it. O;D If I may indulge the List, with the reminder that I won't have access to actual web browsing for another month... What is INC? I separate list of some sort? ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:20:36 -0700 From: WonderGecko Subject: Re: IN> I must ask... On 24.04.2002 7:04 PM, "William J. Keith" wrote: >> Eee. Hello, by the way. I'm new here, and would like to think I reek of >> capricious energy, or something to that effect. > > Welcome. Ofanite, I see. :^) > >> --Kim, Angel of Random Enthusiasm > > William > > That, or a very, very hyper Mercurian. *sagenod* - --Kim, Angel of Random Enthusiasm ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:54:31 -0400 From: "William J. Keith" Subject: RE: IN> Seneschal Question >If I may indulge the List, with the reminder that I won't have access to >actual web browsing for another month... > >What is INC? I separate list of some sort? The In Nomine Collection, a set of web pages. (Sorry, but that's truth. ^_^ ) It takes ideas and suggestions, frequently from the mailing list, and gives them a permanent home on the Web. http://www.sjgames.com/in-nomine/articles is the address, once you do get web browsing available. William ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:26:42 -0700 From: WonderGecko Subject: IN> Okay, a PERTINENT question now...Cherubim! I have, on the sketchbook sitting next to me, a half-completed drawing of an icthyosaur Cherub in Celestial. I'm actually rather enamored of weird things like icthyosaurs, lurchers, red pandas, etc...and wanted to know if those were quite 'correct' as far as IN canon for Cherub celestial forms went. I know 'bears, lions, etc.' is what's stated, but do Cherub celestial forms /have/ to be large, mammalian, and (optionally) predatory, or would ancient invertebrates, large reptiles (except snakes, of course), aquatic mammals, and the like be canon? Would the Cherub in question be regarded as a little strange, or...? The two half-completed ideas of Cherubim I have kicking around are a wild dog/lurcher and a lynx in celestial form, though the icthyosaur (it's really not as awkward as it sounds, honestly!) may eventually acquire a name, too. Anyway. Just stuff I've been wondering for a while. *returns to humming tunelessly and scribbling* - --Kim, Angel of Random Enthusiasm ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:25:04 -0700 From: "Phillip DesJardins" Subject: Re: IN> I must ask... > > Welcome. Ofanite, I see. :^) > > > >> --Kim, Angel of Random Enthusiasm > > That, or a very, very hyper Mercurian. *sagenod* > > --Kim, Angel of Random Enthusiasm > > As a vocal representative of the Mercurian community, I must protest this steryoptyping of our noble Choir. Phillip, Mercurian of Novalis The Happy Shiny Mercurian "The world is made of happy thoughts, and dreams, and chocolate unicorns, and licorice sunsets, and gumdrops..." ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:59:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Maurice Lane Subject: Re: IN> Nothing Like The Sun - --- EDG wrote: > Surprise! ;) Only mildly ... but then, I'm biased towards the guy anyway. :) Moe ===== Liber Licentiae Moeticae: http://www.stormloader.com/users/moelane/innomine.html Last updated 04/13/02(this is usually way out of date) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 01:27:23 -0400 From: "William J. Keith" Subject: Re: IN> Okay, a PERTINENT question now...Cherubim! An ichthyosaur Cherub would be neat. Probably a Cherub that's been around since ivhthyosaurs, in fact. And it should be canon, since I hardly think large mammals are the only option. Hey, Beth has mentioned that she figures Novalis' Cherub form is a giant ladybug, which is neat enough that it should be made canon when Novalis gets written up, IMHO. ;^) >--Kim, Angel of Random Enthusiasm William ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:02:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Walton Subject: Re: IN> Okay, a PERTINENT question now...Cherubim! - --- WonderGecko wrote: > I have, on the sketchbook sitting next to me, a > half-completed drawing of an > icthyosaur Cherub in Celestial. Wow, you are full of capricious energy. I like you already. 0:> > do Cherub celestial forms > /have/ to be large, mammalian, and (optionally) > predatory Not as far as I know. But a Cherub with an ichthyosaur celestial form must be a former Servitor of the Angel of Dinosaurs, yes? Even so, an ichthyosaur would be more appropriate for a Seraph of Animals. Now, a Cherub of Animals whose celestial form was a winged amphicyon... ===== Michael Walton, #US2002023848 "In film, the director is God. In documentaries, God is the director." - -- Alfred Hitchcock __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:06:10 -0400 From: Whistling in the Dark Subject: Re: IN> I must ask... At 9:27 PM -0400 4/24/02, EDG wrote: >At 06:12 PM 4/24/02 -0700, you wrote: > > >>kinks, only that a Top 40 song is somehow involved), am I addicted to IN? > >Not any more than the rest of us. Hell, last year Moe spent five >months basing IN elements on bits from the 2001 calendar... I have every confidence Moe will pick up those other seven months one of these days... it's just his way, you know? - -- Eric Alfred Burns - Impudite of Secrets (candidate for the Word of Obscurity) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 13:23:13 -0400 From: "Brian C. Petery" Subject: IN> Lilim's Trading Cards In "Fall of the Malakim" p. 29, under Celestial Appearance of Geases. it says a Lilim holdng favors may /choose/ to allow tokens to manifest in symbolic form. If a Lilim manifests these on the corporeal plane, does it cause a disturbance in the Symphony? Wee! I'm a Rules Lawyer! BC Petery http://www15.brinkster.com/ugwump/ ------------------------------ End of in_nomine-digest V1 #2613 ********************************